Lakshmamma vs Rangamma — 256/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: FOR STEPS. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN410004702015

FOR STEPS

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

256/2015

Filing Date

01-08-2015

Registration No

256/2015

Registration Date

01-08-2015

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmamma

Adv. SIDDARAJU A.S

Jayamma

Mylaraiah

Lakkamma

Mylarappa

Mallesh

Gangaraju

Jayamma

Lingappa

Respondent(s)

Rangamma

Lingappa

Parijatha

Sumithra

H L Raghavendra

L Guruprasad

Rangamma

Mallaiah

Thriveni

Nagamma

Padmavathi

Honnaiah

Annapurna

Kappanaiah

Ningamma

Jayamma

Gowramma

Lakshmamma

Hemanth Kumar

Shivamma

H Krishnamurthy

Madhusudhan

Asha

Sakkamma

Srinivas

Dakshayini

Manoj

Ramaprasadareddy

shivakumar

Madhanmohan reddy

Hearing History

Judge: 1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

13-03-2026

FOR STEPS

05-02-2026

FOR STEPS

20-01-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT

17-12-2025

WRITTEN STATEMENT

13-11-2025

WRITTEN STATEMENT

Interim Orders

05-12-2023
Orders

Case Summary: O.S. 256/2015 The court allowed defendants' application to set aside ex-parte orders dated 07.10.2015 and 27.03.2017, permitting them to participate in the partition suit. The judge found that while summons were served, the defendants had a meritorious case and denying them the right to defend would violate natural justice principles. The order was set aside with costs of Rs. 1,000 imposed on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 256/2015 The court allowed defendants' application to set aside ex-parte orders dated 07.10.2015 and 27.03.2017, permitting them to participate in the partition suit. The judge found that while summons were served, the defendants had a meritorious case and denying them the right to defend would violate natural justice principles. The order was set aside with costs of Rs. 1,000 imposed on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case