Shobha N vs Mallamma — 220/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: FOR OBJECTION. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN410004192015

FOR OBJECTION

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

220/2015

Filing Date

06-07-2015

Registration No

220/2015

Registration Date

06-07-2015

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

Shobha N

Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR

Pushpa N

Poornima

Lohith N

Respondent(s)

Mallamma

Chikkamma

Narasappa K N

Narayanappa K N

Hanumakka

Nanjamma

Raja K N

Savithramma

Lakshmipathi K N

Bhagyamma

Nagaraju K N

Hearing History

Judge: 1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

18-03-2026

FOR OBJECTION

13-03-2026

FOR OBJECTION

25-02-2026

FOR OBJECTION

13-02-2026

FOR OBJECTION

21-01-2026

FOR OBJECTION

Interim Orders

24-08-2018
Deposition
25-02-2019
Deposition
09-12-2020
Deposition
23-01-2021
Deposition
20-02-2021
Deposition
20-03-2021
Deposition
07-04-2021
Deposition
16-07-2021
Deposition
18-08-2021
Deposition
03-09-2021
Deposition
18-09-2021
Deposition
05-10-2021
Deposition
22-10-2021
Deposition
14-01-2022
Deposition
03-06-2022
Deposition
28-03-2024
Orders

Case Summary: O.S. No. 220/2015 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Magadi Date: 28 March 2024 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (IA No. 16) to add proposed defendants 12-20 as additional defendants in this partition suit. The plaintiffs were directed to file an amended plaint by 18 April 2024. The court found that the proposed defendants—children of the deceased Lakshmamma—are necessary parties as coparceners in the joint family property under the Hindu Succession Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 220/2015 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Magadi Date: 28 March 2024 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (IA No. 16) to add proposed defendants 12-20 as additional defendants in this partition suit. The plaintiffs were directed to file an amended plaint by 18 April 2024. The court found that the proposed defendants—children of the deceased Lakshmamma—are necessary parties as coparceners in the joint family property under the Hindu Succession Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case