STATE BY KARNATAKA, KODIHALLI PS vs Nagaraju — 1675/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN320029822023

e-Filing Number

08-11-2023

Filing Number

1675/2023

Filing Date

08-Nov-2023

Registration No

1675/2023

Registration Date

08-Nov-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA

Judge

873-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0009

Police Station

KODIHALLI PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 447
Explosives Act Section 4(B), 9(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY KARNATAKA, KODIHALLI PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraju

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 1675/2023 State (Karnataka, Kodihalli PS) v. Nagaraju This is a wildlife protection case involving the discovery of 15 bamboo partridges on 28.01.2020. A witness (Chandan, 33, a forest ranger) testified that while constructing a fire line, two bamboo partridges were found at the location, later totaling 15 birds. The witness identified the birds as belonging to respondent Nagaraju based on inquiry with neighboring landowners. The birds were seized on 29.01.2020 and handed to police. On 30.01.2020, an inspection was conducted with panchnama (official documentation). Multiple documentary evidence (FIR, seizure memo, inspection reports, attendance records, and duty rosters from January-February 2020) were admitted as exhibits. The defendant's counsel declined to cross-examine the witness without providing valid reason, resulting in no cross-examination being recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  9. 25-Oct-2025

    ChargeView PDF

  10. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  13. 16-Aug-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  14. 15-Jul-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  16. 23-May-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  19. 23-Sep-2024

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  20. 29-Aug-2024

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  21. 29-Jul-2024

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  22. 28-Jun-2024

    N B W to Accused

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura

  23. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 08-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1675/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 1675/2023 State (Karnataka, Kodihalli PS) v. Nagaraju This is a wildlife protection case involving the discovery of 15 bamboo partridges on 28.01.2020. A witness (Chandan, 33, a forest ranger) testified that while constructing a fire line, two bamboo partridges were found at the location, later totaling 15 birds. The witness identified the birds as belonging to respondent Nagaraju based on inquiry with neighboring landowners. The birds were seized on 29.01.2020 and handed to police. On 30.01.2020, an inspection was conducted with panchnama (official documentation). Multiple documentary evidence (FIR, seizure memo, inspection reports, attendance records, and duty rosters from January-February 2020) were admitted as exhibits. The defendant's counsel declined to cross-examine the witness without providing valid reason, resulting in no cross-examination being recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case