Canara Bank, Harohalli Branch vs Shivanna K M — 309/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN320029412025

Filing Number

308/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

309/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA

Judge

102-Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank, Harohalli Branch

    Adv. DODDAVEREGOWDA V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivanna K M

  2. 2.Rathnamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The suit filed by Canara Bank, Harohalli Branch against Shivanna K M and Rathnamma was settled through lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution). The court closed the case as settled based on a joint memorandum filed by counsels for both parties and directed full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Setlement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Setlement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And Jmfckanakapura

  9. 01-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 309/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The suit filed by Canara Bank, Harohalli Branch against Shivanna K M and Rathnamma was settled through lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution). The court closed the case as settled based on a joint memorandum filed by counsels for both parties and directed full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case