Harohalli Police Station vs Vasantha Kumar — 301/2008
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KARN320008082008
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Date
08-05-2008
Registration No
301/2008
Registration Date
08-05-2008
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA
Judge
102-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCKANAKAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harohalli Police Station
Respondent(s)
Vasantha Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 102-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCKANAKAPURA
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 21-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 301/2008 Case: Harohalli Police Station v. Vasantha Kumar Outcome: The court examined witness testimony on 01.04.2026. The witness (PW-4) testified regarding the seizure of a 40-liter white plastic container of alleged illicit liquor on 23.09.2001. The Government Advocate conducted cross-examination, establishing the witness as adverse to the prosecution's case. The witness denied knowledge of documents prepared (Exhibit-1 and Exhibit-4), denied providing statements to police, and denied familiarity with the accused. The defense counsel declined further cross-examination. The case proceeded with witness examination and the matter continues in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 301/2008 Case: Harohalli Police Station v. Vasantha Kumar Outcome: The court examined witness testimony on 01.04.2026. The witness (PW-4) testified regarding the seizure of a 40-liter white plastic container of alleged illicit liquor on 23.09.2001. The Government Advocate conducted cross-examination, establishing the witness as adverse to the prosecution's case. The witness denied knowledge of documents prepared (Exhibit-1 and Exhibit-4), denied providing statements to police, and denied familiarity with the accused. The defense counsel declined further cross-examination. The case proceeded with witness examination and the matter continues in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts