KODIHALLI PS vs Raghu — 361/2026
Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 92 O and R. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KARN320006992026
Filing Number
383/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
361/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA
Judge
873-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KODIHALLI PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raghu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case 361/2026 Summary: In a Lok Adalath proceeding, accused Raghu pleaded guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the Karnataka Prohibition Act. The court, satisfied that the guilty plea was voluntary and free from coercion, convicted Raghu and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. The charge-sheet was properly furnished and the substance of accusation explained to the accused as per BNSS-2023 procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kanakapura
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 361/2026
Case 361/2026 Summary: In a Lok Adalath proceeding, accused Raghu pleaded guilty to offences under Sections 92(O) and (R) of the Karnataka Prohibition Act. The court, satisfied that the guilty plea was voluntary and free from coercion, convicted Raghu and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment in default. The charge-sheet was properly furnished and the substance of accusation explained to the accused as per BNSS-2023 procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts