RFO KANAKAPURA vs M.N. MANJUNATHA — 645/2012

Case under Karnataka Forest Act 1963 Section 24,33. Status: JUDGEMENT.. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN320006442012

JUDGEMENT.

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Date

21-06-2012

Registration No

645/2012

Registration Date

21-06-2012

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA

Judge

1101-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

KANAKAPURA PS

Year

2011

Acts & Sections

KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 Section 24,33

Petitioner(s)

RFO KANAKAPURA

Respondent(s)

M.N. MANJUNATHA

Hearing History

Judge: 1101-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA

22-05-2026

JUDGEMENT.

24-04-2026

JUDGEMENT.

22-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-04-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Interim Orders

14-09-2022
Deposition
14-09-2022
Deposition
07-08-2025
Deposition
16-04-2026
313 Statement
13-03-2026
Deposition
09-04-2026
Deposition

Case 645/2012 involved a forest-related dispute between RFO Kanakapura (petitioner) and M.N. Manjunatha (respondent). The court heard arguments regarding allegations of illegal forest land leasing and unauthorized tree-cutting on Survey No. 67. The defendant's counsel contested the prosecution's case, arguing the accused never visited the forest area and that false charges were filed based on misleading police records. The court examined witness testimony regarding the lease authorization process and alleged violations of forest regulations. The order indicates the matter was addressed through examination of evidence and witness statements before the Second Additional Civil Judge and JMFC court in Kanakapura. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 645/2012 involved a forest-related dispute between RFO Kanakapura (petitioner) and M.N. Manjunatha (respondent). The court heard arguments regarding allegations of illegal forest land leasing and unauthorized tree-cutting on Survey No. 67. The defendant's counsel contested the prosecution's case, arguing the accused never visited the forest area and that false charges were filed based on misleading police records. The court examined witness testimony regarding the lease authorization process and alleged violations of forest regulations. The order indicates the matter was addressed through examination of evidence and witness statements before the Second Additional Civil Judge and JMFC court in Kanakapura. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case