Sathanur PS vs A.1 Karthik.G — 5063/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section Us 307, 504, 506, 34, 3, 25 Arms Act. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

S.C. - SESSION CASES

CNR: KARN300008012023

EVIDENCE.

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

5063/2023

Filing Date

24-11-2023

Registration No

5063/2023

Registration Date

24-11-2023

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

FIR Details

FIR Number

212

Police Station

SATHANUR PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section Us 307, 504, 506, 34, 3, 25 Arms Act

Petitioner(s)

Sathanur PS (Police Station)

Adv. By PP

Respondent(s)

A.1 Karthik.G

A.2 Paramesh.M.K

Adv. MUNIRAJU K

Hearing History

Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

04-05-2026

EVIDENCE.

08-04-2026

EVIDENCE.

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE.

17-02-2026

EVIDENCE.

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE.

Interim Orders

27-11-2024
Charge
06-11-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: S.C. 5063/2023 The 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanakapura, Bangalore heard testimony in this case dated 06.11.2025. A witness testified but was treated as a hostile witness by the prosecution. The witness denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incident and contradicted key prosecution allegations, including denying witnessing any confrontation between the accused and the victim, or any shooting incident. The witness also disputed the prosecution's timeline and statements regarding events on 06.12.2021 and 08.12.2021. No cross-examination by the accused's counsel was conducted. Physical evidence (Exhibit M.O-28, a white cloth item) was identified and marked during the court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C. 5063/2023 The 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanakapura, Bangalore heard testimony in this case dated 06.11.2025. A witness testified but was treated as a hostile witness by the prosecution. The witness denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incident and contradicted key prosecution allegations, including denying witnessing any confrontation between the accused and the victim, or any shooting incident. The witness also disputed the prosecution's timeline and statements regarding events on 06.12.2021 and 08.12.2021. No cross-examination by the accused's counsel was conducted. Physical evidence (Exhibit M.O-28, a white cloth item) was identified and marked during the court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case