Sathanur PS vs A.1 Karthik.G — 5063/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section Us 307, 504, 506, 34, 3, 25 Arms Act. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
S.C. - SESSION CASES
CNR: KARN300008012023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
5063/2023
Filing Date
24-11-2023
Registration No
5063/2023
Registration Date
24-11-2023
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA
Judge
988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
FIR Details
FIR Number
212
Police Station
SATHANUR PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sathanur PS (Police Station)
Adv. By PP
Respondent(s)
A.1 Karthik.G
A.2 Paramesh.M.K
Adv. MUNIRAJU K
Hearing History
Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C. 5063/2023 The 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanakapura, Bangalore heard testimony in this case dated 06.11.2025. A witness testified but was treated as a hostile witness by the prosecution. The witness denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incident and contradicted key prosecution allegations, including denying witnessing any confrontation between the accused and the victim, or any shooting incident. The witness also disputed the prosecution's timeline and statements regarding events on 06.12.2021 and 08.12.2021. No cross-examination by the accused's counsel was conducted. Physical evidence (Exhibit M.O-28, a white cloth item) was identified and marked during the court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C. 5063/2023 The 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanakapura, Bangalore heard testimony in this case dated 06.11.2025. A witness testified but was treated as a hostile witness by the prosecution. The witness denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incident and contradicted key prosecution allegations, including denying witnessing any confrontation between the accused and the victim, or any shooting incident. The witness also disputed the prosecution's timeline and statements regarding events on 06.12.2021 and 08.12.2021. No cross-examination by the accused's counsel was conducted. Physical evidence (Exhibit M.O-28, a white cloth item) was identified and marked during the court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts