Sathanoor PS vs Rathnamma — 5027/2022
Case under U/s Section 506,307,326,324,354,323,504rw149IPC. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
S.C. - SESSION CASES
CNR: KARN300005282022
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
5027/2022
Filing Date
08-11-2022
Registration No
5027/2022
Registration Date
08-11-2022
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA
Judge
988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sathanoor PS (Police Station)
Adv. By PP
Respondent(s)
Rathnamma
Shilpa Kemmale
Pushpa.K.L
Abhishek
Keshavamurthy
Indramma
Hearing History
Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 22-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
This court order documents witness examination in S.C. 5027/2022 dated 15.09.2025 before the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Kanakapura. A witness (Mutturaju, age 39, a businessman) testified regarding a May 26, 2020 incident involving alleged rioting. The witness identified panchnama documents and seized materials (stones, sticks, rods, glass pieces marked as MO-4 to MO-7). The Government Prosecutor allowed cross-examination treating the witness as partially hostile. The witness gave detailed testimony about police procedures and evidence collection, with extensive cross-examination conducted by the accused's counsel. No further examination was recorded; the witness testimony was read back and confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order documents witness examination in S.C. 5027/2022 dated 15.09.2025 before the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Kanakapura. A witness (Mutturaju, age 39, a businessman) testified regarding a May 26, 2020 incident involving alleged rioting. The witness identified panchnama documents and seized materials (stones, sticks, rods, glass pieces marked as MO-4 to MO-7). The Government Prosecutor allowed cross-examination treating the witness as partially hostile. The witness gave detailed testimony about police procedures and evidence collection, with extensive cross-examination conducted by the accused's counsel. No further examination was recorded; the witness testimony was read back and confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts