M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd., vs Sri. Shivappa.K.M Advocate - K.S.Swamy — 5008/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 21 R 11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KARN300004672023

Case disposed

Filing Number

5008/2023

Filing Date

14-08-2023

Registration No

5008/2023

Registration Date

14-08-2023

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/o 21 R 11

Petitioner(s)

M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.,

Adv. Girisha.S.S.

Respondent(s)

Sri. Shivappa.K.M Advocate - K.S.Swamy

Karage Gowda.M

Adv. K.S.Swamy

Hearing History

Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

14-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

SETTLEMENT

21-02-2026

SETTLEMENT

03-01-2026

call on

12-12-2025

call on

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok-Adalat resolved the dispute between Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. and the respondents through conciliation, with parties settling for Rs. 1,70,000 as full and final settlement. The respondent agreed to repay the settled amount per the joint memo dated 14.03.2026, and both parties confirmed the compromise was reached with free consent without coercion. The court accepted the settlement as lawful consideration and closed the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalat resolved the dispute between Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. and the respondents through conciliation, with parties settling for Rs. 1,70,000 as full and final settlement. The respondent agreed to repay the settled amount per the joint memo dated 14.03.2026, and both parties confirmed the compromise was reached with free consent without coercion. The court accepted the settlement as lawful consideration and closed the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case