Yuvaraja vs Raghu Kumara Advocate - ASHOKA H.L — 5017/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

CRL.A - Criminal APPEAL

CNR: KARN300004622025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5017/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

5017/2025

Registration Date

04-12-2025

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.415(3)

Petitioner(s)

Yuvaraja

Adv. B.S.NarayanaGowda

Respondent(s)

Raghu Kumara Advocate - ASHOKA H.L

Hearing History

Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

SETTLEMENT

09-03-2026

SETTLEMENT

02-03-2026

objection

19-02-2026

objection

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok-Adalat allowed the parties' application under Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act to compound a cheque bounce offense (U/S 138 NI Act). Both Yuvaraja (appellant) and Raghu Kumara (respondent) amicably settled their monetary dispute, with the appellant paying Rs. 5,50,000 to the respondent as full and final settlement. The court imposed a condition requiring the appellant to pay an additional Rs. 5,000 fine within 7 days, after which both parties were permitted to compound the case, effectively extinguishing the criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalat allowed the parties' application under Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act to compound a cheque bounce offense (U/S 138 NI Act). Both Yuvaraja (appellant) and Raghu Kumara (respondent) amicably settled their monetary dispute, with the appellant paying Rs. 5,50,000 to the respondent as full and final settlement. The court imposed a condition requiring the appellant to pay an additional Rs. 5,000 fine within 7 days, after which both parties were permitted to compound the case, effectively extinguishing the criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case