Sri. Govindaiah vs Sri. M.K.Dasappa — 5037/2023
Case under --- Section U/o 41 Rule 1 R/w Sec. 96 of CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KARN300004012023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
5037/2023
Filing Date
31-07-2023
Registration No
5037/2023
Registration Date
31-07-2023
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA
Judge
988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Govindaiah
Adv. Nagaraja K
Sri. Ramaswamy
Sri. Krishna Murthy @ Kannabadaiah
Sri. Srinivasa
Respondent(s)
Sri. M.K.Dasappa
Sri. Kenchaiah
Smt. Kempamma
Sri. Venkatesh
Sri. Nagaraju
Smt. Shobha
Sri. Nanjappa
Smt. Mahadeva
Sri. Umesh
Hearing History
Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 19-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS. |
Interim Orders
In R.A. 5037/2023, the court examined a revision against a judgment in Original Case No. 285/2015 dated 12.02.2018. The petitioners (Govindaiah, Ramaswamy, and Krishna Murthy) challenged the lower court's order regarding property-related disputes and execution matters. The court reviewed the proceedings and found merit in examining whether proper procedures were followed in the execution case. The revision petition was allowed, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In R.A. 5037/2023, the court examined a revision against a judgment in Original Case No. 285/2015 dated 12.02.2018. The petitioners (Govindaiah, Ramaswamy, and Krishna Murthy) challenged the lower court's order regarding property-related disputes and execution matters. The court reviewed the proceedings and found merit in examining whether proper procedures were followed in the execution case. The revision petition was allowed, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts