Ravikumar D B vs Kanakapura Town PS — 5054/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN300000922026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
5054/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
5054/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA
Judge
988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
KANAKAPURA PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravikumar D B
Adv. SHIVANANDA V E
Nagarathna
Adv. SHIVANANDA V E
Bhavya B
Adv. SHIVANANDA V E
Respondent(s)
Kanakapura Town PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Disposed
ORDERS
objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 11-03-2026 | objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5054/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ravikumar D B, Nagarathna, and Bhavya B) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and outrage of modesty stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The judge found that the complaint arose from matrimonial conflict rather than serious criminal conduct, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*. The accused were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each with conditions including regular police attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5054/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ravikumar D B, Nagarathna, and Bhavya B) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and outrage of modesty stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The judge found that the complaint arose from matrimonial conflict rather than serious criminal conduct, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*. The accused were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each with conditions including regular police attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts