Ravikumar D B vs Kanakapura Town PS — 5054/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN300000922026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

5054/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

5054/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

KANAKAPURA PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Ravikumar D B

Adv. SHIVANANDA V E
2.Nagarathna

Adv. SHIVANANDA V E
3.Bhavya B

Adv. SHIVANANDA V E

Respondent(s)

1.Kanakapura Town PS (Police Station)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
23-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5054/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ravikumar D B, Nagarathna, and Bhavya B) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and outrage of modesty stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The judge found that the complaint arose from matrimonial conflict rather than serious criminal conduct, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*. The accused were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each with conditions including regular police attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
23-Mar-2026

Disposed

II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura
13-Mar-2026

Orders

II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 5054/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5054/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ravikumar D B, Nagarathna, and Bhavya B) in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and outrage of modesty stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The judge found that the complaint arose from matrimonial conflict rather than serious criminal conduct, and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar*. The accused were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each with conditions including regular police attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.