Umesh DG vs Kodihalli police — 5053/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 325. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN300000912026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

5053/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

5053/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

05

Police Station

KODIHALLI PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 325
EXPLOSIVES ACT Section 4, 3

Petitioner(s)

Umesh DG

Adv. DHANUSH.D

Respondent(s)

Kodihalli police

Hearing History

Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

25-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

objection

11-03-2026

objection

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Orders

The court granted anticipatory bail to Umesh DG (Accused No.4) in a case involving alleged illegal possession of explosive substances that killed livestock on the complainant's land. The court found exceptional circumstances warranted bail despite prosecution objections, relying on principles from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding unnecessary custodial detention. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, non-involvement in similar activities, and biweekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Umesh DG (Accused No.4) in a case involving alleged illegal possession of explosive substances that killed livestock on the complainant's land. The court found exceptional circumstances warranted bail despite prosecution objections, relying on principles from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding unnecessary custodial detention. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, non-involvement in similar activities, and biweekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case