Umesh DG vs Kodihalli police — 5053/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 325. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN300000912026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

5053/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

5053/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

05

Police Station

KODIHALLI PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 325
Explosives Act Section 4, 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Umesh DG

    Adv. DHANUSH.D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kodihalli police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Umesh DG (Accused No.4) in a case involving alleged illegal possession of explosive substances that killed livestock on the complainant's land. The court found exceptional circumstances warranted bail despite prosecution objections, relying on principles from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding unnecessary custodial detention. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, non-involvement in similar activities, and biweekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    objection

    II Addl. District And Sessions Court Kanakapura

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5053/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Umesh DG (Accused No.4) in a case involving alleged illegal possession of explosive substances that killed livestock on the complainant's land. The court found exceptional circumstances warranted bail despite prosecution objections, relying on principles from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* regarding unnecessary custodial detention. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, non-involvement in similar activities, and biweekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case