Dileep vs State of Karnatak by Range Forest Officer and Wild Life Range Guard, — 5050/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN300000862026

Case disposed

Filing Number

5050/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

5050/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA

Judge

988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

R.F.O, KANAKAPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.483

Petitioner(s)

Dileep

Adv. JAGADEESHA C.M

Doddalingegowda @ Abhi

Respondent(s)

State of Karnatak by Range Forest Officer and Wild Life Range Guard,

Hearing History

Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDERS

09-03-2026

objection

06-03-2026

objection

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5050/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Dileep and Doddalingegowda) charged under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 for allegedly illegally trespassing into Chavarakallu reserve forest with country-made guns to hunt wildlife. The judge found the accused had made out a prima facie case for bail under section 483 BNSS-2023, noting the offences were non-capital and investigation was ongoing without demonstrated need for custodial presence. Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bonds with conditions including witness non-interference, investigation cooperation, attendance before forest authorities, and prohibition from similar criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5050/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Dileep and Doddalingegowda) charged under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 for allegedly illegally trespassing into Chavarakallu reserve forest with country-made guns to hunt wildlife. The judge found the accused had made out a prima facie case for bail under section 483 BNSS-2023, noting the offences were non-capital and investigation was ongoing without demonstrated need for custodial presence. Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bonds with conditions including witness non-interference, investigation cooperation, attendance before forest authorities, and prohibition from similar criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case