Dileep vs State of Karnatak by Range Forest Officer and Wild Life Range Guard, — 5050/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN300000862026
Filing Number
5050/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
5050/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, SITTING AT KANAKAPURA
Judge
988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
R.F.O, KANAKAPURA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dileep
Adv. JAGADEESHA C.M
Doddalingegowda @ Abhi
Respondent(s)
State of Karnatak by Range Forest Officer and Wild Life Range Guard,
Hearing History
Judge: 988-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANAKAPURA
Disposed
ORDERS
objection
objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-03-2026 | objection |
| 06-03-2026 | objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5050/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Dileep and Doddalingegowda) charged under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 for allegedly illegally trespassing into Chavarakallu reserve forest with country-made guns to hunt wildlife. The judge found the accused had made out a prima facie case for bail under section 483 BNSS-2023, noting the offences were non-capital and investigation was ongoing without demonstrated need for custodial presence. Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bonds with conditions including witness non-interference, investigation cooperation, attendance before forest authorities, and prohibition from similar criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.5050/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Dileep and Doddalingegowda) charged under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 for allegedly illegally trespassing into Chavarakallu reserve forest with country-made guns to hunt wildlife. The judge found the accused had made out a prima facie case for bail under section 483 BNSS-2023, noting the offences were non-capital and investigation was ongoing without demonstrated need for custodial presence. Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bonds with conditions including witness non-interference, investigation cooperation, attendance before forest authorities, and prohibition from similar criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts