Shilpha vs Bhojegowda — 457/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN220034302025

Filing Number

458/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

457/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

97-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shilpha

    Adv. SHASHIKALA.Y.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhojegowda

  2. 2.Sarojamma aliyas Saroja

  3. 3.Kumar B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court decreed O.S. No. 457/2025 in terms of a compromise petition wherein petitioner Shilpha and defendants Bhojegowda and Sarojamma relinquished their rights over the suit property in favor of defendant Kumar B. in exchange for ₹3,50,000. The court found the compromise petition valid and not opposed to any law or public policy, and directed the office to draw a final decree incorporating the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 457/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed O.S. No. 457/2025 in terms of a compromise petition wherein petitioner Shilpha and defendants Bhojegowda and Sarojamma relinquished their rights over the suit property in favor of defendant Kumar B. in exchange for ₹3,50,000. The court found the compromise petition valid and not opposed to any law or public policy, and directed the office to draw a final decree incorporating the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case