Siddamma vs Prakasha — 223/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,and,2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX_PARTE on 01st July 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN220028572023

Filing Number

223/2023

Filing Date

27-Jun-2023

Registration No

223/2023

Registration Date

27-Jun-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

97-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Decision Date

01-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX_PARTE

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,and,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siddamma

    Adv. S. B. DHANANJAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakasha

  2. 2.Shivalingaiah

  3. 3.Ashwatha D.K.

  4. 4.Raju D.K.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Judgments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This document is a procedural hearing order in Case 223/2023 (Siddamma v. Prakasha and others) dated 08.01.2026. The court recorded witness testimony under oath and admitted multiple documents as evidence, including a permission letter (Exhibit 2), survey records from 2019-20 and 2023-24 (Exhibits 3 and 12), an MRH document from 2017-18 (Exhibit 4), a police station report (Exhibit 5), five photographs (Exhibits 6-10), and a sketch map (Exhibit 11). The respondents did not contest the case, so no cross-examination occurred, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  12. 20-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    For Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  14. 27-Jun-2025

    For Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  15. 21-Mar-2025

    For Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  17. 23-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  19. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  20. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  21. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  22. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  23. 22-Jan-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  24. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  25. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  26. 04-Oct-2023

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  27. 02-Sep-2023

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  28. 19-Aug-2023

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  29. 20-Jul-2023

    Written Statements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  30. 27-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a procedural hearing order in Case 223/2023 (Siddamma v. Prakasha and others) dated 08.01.2026. The court recorded witness testimony under oath and admitted multiple documents as evidence, including a permission letter (Exhibit 2), survey records from 2019-20 and 2023-24 (Exhibits 3 and 12), an MRH document from 2017-18 (Exhibit 4), a police station report (Exhibit 5), five photographs (Exhibits 6-10), and a sketch map (Exhibit 11). The respondents did not contest the case, so no cross-examination occurred, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case