Channapatna Rural P.S. vs Navaz Pasha — 1397/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 380. Status: Evidence Criminal. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Evidence Criminal Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN220024622024

Filing Number

1402/2024

Filing Date

06-May-2024

Registration No

1397/2024

Registration Date

06-May-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

97-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

256

Police Station

CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457, 380

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Channapatna Rural P.S.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Navaz Pasha

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 1397/2024 In this case before the Principal District and Sessions Court in Channapatna, a witness (Raju, age 46) testified regarding gold jewelry weighing 67.5 grams that was examined at his shop. The witness stated he could not recall specific details about when the jewelry was brought for examination or confirm its ownership, and that he only verifies the purity of jewelry brought to him, not ownership matters. Cross-examination by both the prosecution and defense counsel yielded no further substantive information. The court record indicates the witness testimony was recorded on June 3, 2026, with no further cross-examination indicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 23-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 23-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  16. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  19. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  22. 04-Apr-2025

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  23. 21-Jan-2025

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  24. 11-Nov-2024

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  25. 03-Sep-2024

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  26. 06-Aug-2024

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  27. 16-Jul-2024

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  28. 10-Jun-2024

    Charge / Hbc / Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  29. 07-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 06-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1397/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1397/2024 In this case before the Principal District and Sessions Court in Channapatna, a witness (Raju, age 46) testified regarding gold jewelry weighing 67.5 grams that was examined at his shop. The witness stated he could not recall specific details about when the jewelry was brought for examination or confirm its ownership, and that he only verifies the purity of jewelry brought to him, not ownership matters. Cross-examination by both the prosecution and defense counsel yielded no further substantive information. The court record indicates the witness testimony was recorded on June 3, 2026, with no further cross-examination indicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case