Canara Bank vs Anil. V. — 316/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,26,R/w,U/o,7,Rule,1,of,theCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN220022942025

Filing Number

318/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

316/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

902-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s,26,R/w,U/o,7,Rule,1,of,theCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank

    Adv. PUNEETH.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anil. V.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The case between Canara Bank (petitioner) and Anil V. (respondent) was heard before the National Lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum). Both parties and their counsel appeared and filed a settlement memo, which was accepted by the court. The case was fully disposed of based on the memo settlement, and the court directed the office to refund the court fee to the petitioner upon proper identification and ID proof verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  6. 29-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The case between Canara Bank (petitioner) and Anil V. (respondent) was heard before the National Lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum). Both parties and their counsel appeared and filed a settlement memo, which was accepted by the court. The case was fully disposed of based on the memo settlement, and the court directed the office to refund the court fee to the petitioner upon proper identification and ID proof verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case