Anil Kumar S.K. vs Tahasildar — 587/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN220022072025
e-Filing Number
06-08-2025
Filing Number
595/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
587/2025
Registration Date
14-Aug-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
97-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anil Kumar S.K.
Adv. devaraju ptd
-
2.Puttaboramma
-
3.Jayamma
-
4.Krishnamurthy
-
5.Uma
-
6.Rajamma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tahasildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 587/2025 The court granted the petitioners' application to register the death of Smt. Kempamma (wife of late Giriyayya) dated 10.06.1948 in Sukalgerr village, Channappattana taluk, Bangalore South district. The petitioners had sought delayed registration citing that the death certificate was not previously registered with the Tahasildar's office. The court accepted the evidence and directed the Tahasildar to register the death and pay applicable late registration fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
17-Feb-2026
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
19-Jan-2026
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Criminal
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
16-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 587/2025
Case Summary: 587/2025 The court granted the petitioners' application to register the death of Smt. Kempamma (wife of late Giriyayya) dated 10.06.1948 in Sukalgerr village, Channappattana taluk, Bangalore South district. The petitioners had sought delayed registration citing that the death certificate was not previously registered with the Tahasildar's office. The court accepted the evidence and directed the Tahasildar to register the death and pay applicable late registration fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts