Naveen.S. vs Padmamma — 280/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN220021112025

Filing Number

282/2025

Filing Date

01-Aug-2025

Registration No

280/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

902-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naveen.S.

    Adv. SHIVAKUMAR G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Padmamma

  2. 2.Sukesh.K.

  3. 3.Supriya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 280/2025 Summary: The National Lok Adalath dismissed the suit filed by petitioner Naveen.S. against Padmamma, Sukesh.K., and Supriya after the plaintiff's advocate filed a memo and the plaintiff withdrew the case. The court accepted the withdrawal and directed refund of court fees to the petitioner as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Compromise

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Compromise

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  9. 01-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 280/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 280/2025 Summary: The National Lok Adalath dismissed the suit filed by petitioner Naveen.S. against Padmamma, Sukesh.K., and Supriya after the plaintiff's advocate filed a memo and the plaintiff withdrew the case. The court accepted the withdrawal and directed refund of court fees to the petitioner as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case