Yogakshemam Loans Limited, vs Kalavathi. K.S. — 630/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s,138,of,NI,ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN220014192025

Filing Number

638/2025

Filing Date

04-Jun-2025

Registration No

630/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

902-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s,138,of,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yogakshemam Loans Limited,

    Adv. SHIVAPRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalavathi. K.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In case 630/2025 between Yogakshemam Loans Limited and Kalavathi K.S., the Lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a settlement memo filed by both parties and their counsel. The case was fully satisfied and disposed based on the agreed memo, resulting in an amicable resolution between the petitioner and respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  6. 23-Oct-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna

  7. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 630/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In case 630/2025 between Yogakshemam Loans Limited and Kalavathi K.S., the Lok-adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a settlement memo filed by both parties and their counsel. The case was fully satisfied and disposed based on the agreed memo, resulting in an amicable resolution between the petitioner and respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case