A.S. Ankegowda vs C. Chandru — 49/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1. Status: Issues.. Next hearing: 13th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN220003712024
Filing Number
49/2024
Filing Date
01-Feb-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
01-Feb-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
97-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.S. Ankegowda
Adv. THIMMEGOWDA K.T
Respondent(s)
-
1.C. Chandru
-
2.K. Ankegowda
-
3.Channegowda
-
4.K. Lokesha
Case History
-
13-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
08-Jan-2026
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
17-Oct-2025
Conciliation
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
02-Aug-2025
Conciliation
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
19-Apr-2025
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
07-Feb-2025
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
07-Nov-2024
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
18-Sep-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 49/2024 The court dismissed plaintiff A.S. Ankegowda's interim application (I.A. No. II) seeking a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from constructing on disputed property (B schedule property). While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of encroachment on inherited land, it concluded the balance of convenience and irreparable injury tests favored the defendants. The court ruled that monetary compensation upon final judgment would adequately remedy any harm to the plaintiff, whereas granting the injunction would inequitably restrict defendants' use of property they claim ownership through 1967 sale deeds. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2024
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
24-Aug-2024
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
02-Aug-2024
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
10-Jul-2024
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
04-Jul-2024
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
25-Jun-2024
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
15-Jun-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
01-Jun-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
24-Apr-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
01-Apr-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
19-Mar-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
07-Mar-2024
To Hear On I.A
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
26-Feb-2024
Written Statements
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channapatna
-
01-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2024
Case Summary: OS 49/2024 The court dismissed plaintiff A.S. Ankegowda's interim application (I.A. No. II) seeking a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from constructing on disputed property (B schedule property). While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of encroachment on inherited land, it concluded the balance of convenience and irreparable injury tests favored the defendants. The court ruled that monetary compensation upon final judgment would adequately remedy any harm to the plaintiff, whereas granting the injunction would inequitably restrict defendants' use of property they claim ownership through 1967 sale deeds. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts