Mohammed Peer Saheb vs The Secretary — 42/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,ans2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN220002712025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
27-01-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
27-01-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
902-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC Channapatna
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Peer Saheb
Adv. MANJESH KUMAR C
Respondent(s)
The Secretary
The Registrar/Birth and Death, Channapatna
Hearing History
Judge: 902-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC Channapatna
Disposed
JUDGMENTS.
JUDGMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-01-2026 | JUDGMENTS. |
| 07-01-2026 | JUDGMENTS. |
| 04-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 20-09-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking to change her son's name from Mohammad Peer Saheb to Mohammad Fawad in his birth certificate. The judge ruled that under the Births and Deaths Act, 1969, only minor clerical errors can be corrected in birth certificates, not complete name changes, and that once a name is registered, it must remain unchanged except for minor spelling mistakes. The court noted that the plaintiff's desire to change the name based on astrological advice did not constitute a valid legal ground for alteration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking to change her son's name from Mohammad Peer Saheb to Mohammad Fawad in his birth certificate. The judge ruled that under the Births and Deaths Act, 1969, only minor clerical errors can be corrected in birth certificates, not complete name changes, and that once a name is registered, it must remain unchanged except for minor spelling mistakes. The court noted that the plaintiff's desire to change the name based on astrological advice did not constitute a valid legal ground for alteration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts