Mariyappa N.K vs Raju — 489/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S.166. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN210018562023

Filing Number

489/2023

Filing Date

12-Dec-2023

Registration No

489/2023

Registration Date

13-Dec-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mariyappa N.K

    Adv. H Krishnegowda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju

  2. 2.The Manager, Epco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 21-May-2026

    Deposition

    Case Summary: MVC 489/2023 Case: Motor Vehicle Case 489/2023 Petitioner: Mariyappa N.K Respondent: Raju and The Manager, Epco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Outcome: On 21.05.2026, witness PW-2 was examined under oath. The court heard arguments from both parties' counsels. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including exhibits (Inpatient records NI-14, discharge certificate NI-15, medical report NI-16, and extract NI-17). The respondent's counsel cross-examined regarding the petitioner's injury (tibia fracture), disability certification period (2 years 3 months), and post-discharge physiotherapy treatment. The court found that disability was certified for only one limb and that the disability certification was not scientifically comprehensive. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-May-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 24-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Issue

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    Deposition

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 18-Jul-2024

    Objection

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 16-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 20-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 489/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 489/2023 Case: Motor Vehicle Case 489/2023 Petitioner: Mariyappa N.K Respondent: Raju and The Manager, Epco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Outcome: On 21.05.2026, witness PW-2 was examined under oath. The court heard arguments from both parties' counsels. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including exhibits (Inpatient records NI-14, discharge certificate NI-15, medical report NI-16, and extract NI-17). The respondent's counsel cross-examined regarding the petitioner's injury (tibia fracture), disability certification period (2 years 3 months), and post-discharge physiotherapy treatment. The court found that disability was certified for only one limb and that the disability certification was not scientifically comprehensive. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case