Shivalinga @ Shivalingaiah vs Shivakumar R N — 439/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 11th July 2026.

A.D.R. Next hearing 11-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN210015132022

Filing Number

439/2022

Filing Date

29-Nov-2022

Registration No

439/2022

Registration Date

29-Nov-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivalinga @ Shivalingaiah

    Adv. M.K.NINGAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivakumar R N

  2. 2.The Manager, Bajaj allianz general insurance Co. Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 11-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    A.D.R.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 19-May-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC 439/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation case involves petitioner Shivalinga against respondents Shivakumar R N and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. On 16.04.2026, the court examined the petitioner's witness (PW-1) who testified about a vehicle accident where the petitioner suffered a bone fracture requiring surgical treatment and 15 days hospitalization. The witness testimony revealed inconsistencies regarding accident details, supporting documents, and medical expenses (claimed at 3 lakhs). The court adjourned the case for further examination, noting that no supporting documents were produced regarding the accident, treatment, or expenses despite being referenced in testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Settelment

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Settelment

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Settelment

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 15-May-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 21-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 21-Mar-2024

    IssueView PDF

  22. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 01-Feb-2024

    Issues.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 26-Oct-2023

    IssueView PDF

  25. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 10-Aug-2023

    Issues.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 04-May-2023

    Issues.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 23-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 07-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 29-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 439/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation case involves petitioner Shivalinga against respondents Shivakumar R N and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. On 16.04.2026, the court examined the petitioner's witness (PW-1) who testified about a vehicle accident where the petitioner suffered a bone fracture requiring surgical treatment and 15 days hospitalization. The witness testimony revealed inconsistencies regarding accident details, supporting documents, and medical expenses (claimed at 3 lakhs). The court adjourned the case for further examination, noting that no supporting documents were produced regarding the accident, treatment, or expenses despite being referenced in testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case