Padmamma W/o Late Sannaiah vs Shanthamma J W/o Dinesha — 367/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN210010572024
Filing Number
367/2024
Filing Date
29-Oct-2024
Registration No
367/2024
Registration Date
29-Oct-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Padmamma W/o Late Sannaiah
Adv. M.K.NINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shanthamma J W/o Dinesha
-
2.The Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-May-2026
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Apr-2026
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jan-2026
Deposition
MVC No. 367/2024 - Summary On 29.01.2026, the court examined the petitioner's (Padmamma) witness and recorded their affidavit. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence during the main hearing. The respondent's counsel sought adjournment for cross-examination, which was granted. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting that the respondent did not file a written reply and was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2025
Issue
-
16-Oct-2025
Issue
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jul-2025
Issues.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Objection
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 367/2024
MVC No. 367/2024 - Summary On 29.01.2026, the court examined the petitioner's (Padmamma) witness and recorded their affidavit. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence during the main hearing. The respondent's counsel sought adjournment for cross-examination, which was granted. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting that the respondent did not file a written reply and was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts