Anilkumar.D vs Rangamma — 151/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN210010522023
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
02-08-2023
Registration No
151/2023
Registration Date
02-08-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anilkumar.D
Adv. M. N. HEMA
Respondent(s)
Rangamma
Nagaraju
Rajendra.Y.N
Jayashree.D
Lokesh.N
Shruthi.Y.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
A.D.R.
Settelment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 28-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 05-02-2026 | Settelment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 151/2023 On June 2, 2026, the court examined witness PW-1 and recorded their sworn testimony. The petitioner's counsel (S.S.) appeared and submitted affidavit evidence for the main hearing. Various documentary evidence was marked, including a purchase deed (NIP-1), witness signature (NIP-1A), respondents' documents (NIP-1B and C), account statement (NIP-2), notice (NIP-3), postal acknowledgments (NIP-4 and 5), postal receipts (NIP-6 and 7), and postal certificates (NIP-8 to 11). The respondents' counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted. The case was adjourned for continuation of main hearing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 151/2023 On June 2, 2026, the court examined witness PW-1 and recorded their sworn testimony. The petitioner's counsel (S.S.) appeared and submitted affidavit evidence for the main hearing. Various documentary evidence was marked, including a purchase deed (NIP-1), witness signature (NIP-1A), respondents' documents (NIP-1B and C), account statement (NIP-2), notice (NIP-3), postal acknowledgments (NIP-4 and 5), postal receipts (NIP-6 and 7), and postal certificates (NIP-8 to 11). The respondents' counsel sought time for cross-examination, which was granted. The case was adjourned for continuation of main hearing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts