Akkur PS vs Srinivasa — 388/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s,324,504,506 r/w 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

C.C. - Criminal CASES

CNR: KARN210010062023

Case disposed

Filing Number

388/2023

Filing Date

25-07-2023

Registration No

388/2023

Registration Date

25-07-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

AKKUR PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section U/s,324,504,506 r/w 34

Petitioner(s)

Akkur PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Srinivasa

Mudda

Naveena

Yallegowda

Hearing History

Judge: 961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT.

26-02-2026

JUDGEMENT.

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT.

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgment

Summary of Case 388/2023 The court acquitted the accused (Srinivasa, Mudda, and Yallegauda) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 324, 506 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and defamation beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution's witnesses provided contradictory statements that undermined the case, and the court held that the burden of proof had not been satisfactorily discharged to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-02-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 388/2023 The court acquitted the accused (Srinivasa, Mudda, and Yallegauda) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 324, 506 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and defamation beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution's witnesses provided contradictory statements that undermined the case, and the court held that the burden of proof had not been satisfactorily discharged to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case