Chikkamadegowda vs Srinivasa — 23/2022

Case Summary: R.A No.23/2022 In this property dispute appeal, appellant Chikkamadegowda sought a temporary injunction to restrain respondents from interfering with disputed agricultural land. The court found that appellant failed to establish a prima-facie case, as evidence showed the property had been partially sold to third parties (Melaiah) prior to appellant's alleged purchase, and appellant had concealed these material facts. The court dismissed the temporary injunction application (IA No.II) on March 2, 2026, finding no prima-facie case, no balance of convenience in appellant's favor, and no irreparable injury warranting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.