Darshan Gowda B R Since minor Rptd by his Father Ramalingaiah vs B L Ramesh — 375/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN210008942025
Filing Number
152/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
375/2025
Registration Date
24-Oct-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Darshan Gowda B R Since minor Rptd by his Father Ramalingaiah
Adv. T.V.G.LAW CHAMBERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.B L Ramesh
-
2.The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distrubuter
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed a joint settlement memo between minor petitioner Darshan Gowda B R (represented by his father) and respondents B L Ramesh and The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distributor. The respondents agreed to pay Rs. 80,000 as full and final compensation, which the petitioner accepted. The court directed respondents to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which the compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2026
Notice
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 375/2025
The court allowed a joint settlement memo between minor petitioner Darshan Gowda B R (represented by his father) and respondents B L Ramesh and The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distributor. The respondents agreed to pay Rs. 80,000 as full and final compensation, which the petitioner accepted. The court directed respondents to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which the compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts