Darshan Gowda B R Since minor Rptd by his Father Ramalingaiah vs B L Ramesh — 375/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN210008942025

Filing Number

152/2025

Filing Date

18-Oct-2025

Registration No

375/2025

Registration Date

24-Oct-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Darshan Gowda B R Since minor Rptd by his Father Ramalingaiah

    Adv. T.V.G.LAW CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B L Ramesh

  2. 2.The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distrubuter

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed a joint settlement memo between minor petitioner Darshan Gowda B R (represented by his father) and respondents B L Ramesh and The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distributor. The respondents agreed to pay Rs. 80,000 as full and final compensation, which the petitioner accepted. The court directed respondents to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which the compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 31-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 375/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed a joint settlement memo between minor petitioner Darshan Gowda B R (represented by his father) and respondents B L Ramesh and The Manager Cristal Tractor and Distributor. The respondents agreed to pay Rs. 80,000 as full and final compensation, which the petitioner accepted. The court directed respondents to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which the compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case