Excise P S vs Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L — 257/2019
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 11.14.32(1),38(A),43(A). Status: S/S to Accused. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
C.C. - Criminal CASES
CNR: KARN210008552019
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
257/2019
Filing Date
07-09-2019
Registration No
257/2019
Registration Date
07-09-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
EXCISE PS, CHANNAPATANA
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Excise P S
Respondent(s)
Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L
Hearing History
Judge: 961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
S/S to Accused
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | S/S to Accused |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 257/2019 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna Parties: Excise P.S. (Petitioner) v. Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L (Respondent) Outcome: Case adjourned. On 16.03.2026, witness was examined and sworn testimony recorded. The witness (accused Shankar, 55 years old, farmer) testified that police did not present the mahazar (seizure report) before him, and that his signature on exhibits NI-1(B) is disputed. The court permitted the respondent's advocate to cross-examine as the witness was deemed wholly adverse. No further cross-examination scheduled; witness examination completed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 257/2019 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna Parties: Excise P.S. (Petitioner) v. Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L (Respondent) Outcome: Case adjourned. On 16.03.2026, witness was examined and sworn testimony recorded. The witness (accused Shankar, 55 years old, farmer) testified that police did not present the mahazar (seizure report) before him, and that his signature on exhibits NI-1(B) is disputed. The court permitted the respondent's advocate to cross-examine as the witness was deemed wholly adverse. No further cross-examination scheduled; witness examination completed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts