Excise P S vs Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L — 257/2019

Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 11.14.32(1),38(A),43(A). Status: S/S to Accused. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

C.C. - Criminal CASES

CNR: KARN210008552019

S/S to Accused

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

257/2019

Filing Date

07-09-2019

Registration No

257/2019

Registration Date

07-09-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

EXCISE PS, CHANNAPATANA

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT 1965 Section 11.14.32(1),38(A),43(A)

Petitioner(s)

Excise P S

Respondent(s)

Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L

Hearing History

Judge: 961-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

16-05-2026

S/S to Accused

16-03-2026

EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE

20-12-2025

EVIDENCE

04-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Deposition
16-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 257/2019 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna Parties: Excise P.S. (Petitioner) v. Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L (Respondent) Outcome: Case adjourned. On 16.03.2026, witness was examined and sworn testimony recorded. The witness (accused Shankar, 55 years old, farmer) testified that police did not present the mahazar (seizure report) before him, and that his signature on exhibits NI-1(B) is disputed. The court permitted the respondent's advocate to cross-examine as the witness was deemed wholly adverse. No further cross-examination scheduled; witness examination completed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 257/2019 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna Parties: Excise P.S. (Petitioner) v. Neelakanta Advocate - SHIVARAJU L (Respondent) Outcome: Case adjourned. On 16.03.2026, witness was examined and sworn testimony recorded. The witness (accused Shankar, 55 years old, farmer) testified that police did not present the mahazar (seizure report) before him, and that his signature on exhibits NI-1(B) is disputed. The court permitted the respondent's advocate to cross-examine as the witness was deemed wholly adverse. No further cross-examination scheduled; witness examination completed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case