Chowdamma vs Puttaswamy.M — 197/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/sec.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN210007072023
Filing Number
197/2023
Filing Date
27-05-2023
Registration No
197/2023
Registration Date
27-05-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chowdamma
Adv. M.K.NINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
Puttaswamy.M
The Manager, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
A.D.R.
Settelment
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 22-01-2026 | Settelment |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary - MVC 197/2023: Petitioner Chowdamma's case against respondents Puttaswamy.M and HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. was settled through voluntary compromise at the National Lok Adalath. The court approved a joint memo wherein respondent No. 2 (HDFC Ergo) agreed to pay Rs. 6,32,000 as full and final settlement, which the petitioner accepted. The petition was disposed of with respondent No. 2 required to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary - MVC 197/2023: Petitioner Chowdamma's case against respondents Puttaswamy.M and HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. was settled through voluntary compromise at the National Lok Adalath. The court approved a joint memo wherein respondent No. 2 (HDFC Ergo) agreed to pay Rs. 6,32,000 as full and final settlement, which the petitioner accepted. The petition was disposed of with respondent No. 2 required to deposit the agreed amount within two months, after which compensation would be released to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts