Akkur PS vs Puttaswamy Advocate - HARIS KHAN — 175/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s,323,504,506,R/w,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - Criminal CASES

CNR: KARN210005862021

Filing Number

175/2021

Filing Date

12-Jul-2021

Registration No

175/2021

Registration Date

12-Jul-2021

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

961-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

AKKUR PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/s,323,504,506,R/w,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akkur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Puttaswamy Advocate - HARIS KHAN

  2. 2.Shobha

    Adv. HARIS KHAN

  3. 3.Mamatha

    Adv. HARIS KHAN

  4. 4.Vinaykumar

    Adv. HARIS KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 175/2021 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Puttaswamy, Shobha, Mamatha, and Vinay Kumar) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 323, and 506 (with Section 34). The prosecution failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness contradicted the charges and the accused were discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 27-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 05-Jan-2024

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 20-Oct-2023

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 02-Sep-2023

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 28-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 26-Apr-2023

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 23-Dec-2022

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 03-Dec-2022

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 12-Aug-2022

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 07-Jun-2022

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 18-Mar-2022

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 18-Dec-2021

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 04-Dec-2021

    A.D.R.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 26-Oct-2021

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 24-Sep-2021

    Charges

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 07-Sep-2021

    S/S to Accused

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 12-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 12-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 175/2021 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Puttaswamy, Shobha, Mamatha, and Vinay Kumar) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 323, and 506 (with Section 34). The prosecution failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness contradicted the charges and the accused were discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case