Jayanth Gowda N S vs Nanjunda K N Advocate - LAKSHMANA T.M — 165/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN210005452022

Filing Number

165/2022

Filing Date

13-May-2022

Registration No

165/2022

Registration Date

13-May-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayanth Gowda N S

    Adv. M.K.NINGAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nanjunda K N Advocate - LAKSHMANA T.M

  2. 2.Darshan

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 25-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 165/2022 On 25.07.2024, the court heard the matter and admitted various documents into evidence, including the petitioner's statement (PW-1), the respondent advocate's statement (PW-2), a copy of the petition (PW-3), a DSR memo (PW-4), supporting documents (PW-5), 74 case files (PW-6), 14 consultation papers (PW-7), and 5 letters (PW-8). The court directed that the respondent advocate's statement be marked as an additional exhibit. The order indicates case proceedings were conducted with evidence recorded, though the specific final outcome (whether petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) is not clearly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 02-May-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 19-Oct-2023

    IssueView PDF

  20. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 13-Jul-2023

    Issues.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 30-Mar-2023

    Issues.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 23-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 12-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 17-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 11-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 24-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 13-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 165/2022 On 25.07.2024, the court heard the matter and admitted various documents into evidence, including the petitioner's statement (PW-1), the respondent advocate's statement (PW-2), a copy of the petition (PW-3), a DSR memo (PW-4), supporting documents (PW-5), 74 case files (PW-6), 14 consultation papers (PW-7), and 5 letters (PW-8). The court directed that the respondent advocate's statement be marked as an additional exhibit. The order indicates case proceedings were conducted with evidence recorded, though the specific final outcome (whether petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) is not clearly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case