Fiza Mehthab vs NIL — 158/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,rule,1and,2,rw,26. Status: Judgments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Judgments Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN210005122025

Filing Number

167/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

961-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,rule,1and,2,rw,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fiza Mehthab

    Adv. BHAGYAMMA

  2. 2.Haider Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS.No.158/2025 On 24.04.2026, the court called a witness and administered oath. The respondent's counsel argued that all facts mentioned in the witness affidavit are true and should be considered as evidence; documents related to the case were marked as Exhibit DW-1. The petitioner's counsel made counter-arguments stating no cross-examination was required. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Matter referd to Mediation A/M Report

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Matter referd to Mediation A/M Report

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Matter referd to Mediation A/M Report

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.No.158/2025 On 24.04.2026, the court called a witness and administered oath. The respondent's counsel argued that all facts mentioned in the witness affidavit are true and should be considered as evidence; documents related to the case were marked as Exhibit DW-1. The petitioner's counsel made counter-arguments stating no cross-examination was required. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case