Yashodamma vs Gowramma — 77/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1 of CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN210005082023
Filing Number
78/2023
Filing Date
11-Apr-2023
Registration No
77/2023
Registration Date
11-Apr-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Yashodamma
Adv. DILIP KUMAR
-
2.Sandya.N
-
3.Sagar.N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gowramma
-
2.Ravikumar.M.R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S./77/2023 Court Decision: The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering defendants to execute a sale deed for the property within two months upon receipt of the balance sale consideration. The plaintiffs must deposit the remaining amount (₹1,00,000) with the court within 30 days. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendants had validly executed a registered sale agreement dated 22.12.2017 and received substantial advance payment of ₹5,00,000, which effectively admitted the contract's existence. Since the defendants received the substantial consideration, no further proof was required from the plaintiffs under Supreme Court precedent. The defendants' failure to file a written statement and cross-examine witnesses left the plaintiffs' evidence unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Sep-2025
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jun-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Dec-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2023
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2023
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2023
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2023
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2023
Case Summary: O.S./77/2023 Court Decision: The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering defendants to execute a sale deed for the property within two months upon receipt of the balance sale consideration. The plaintiffs must deposit the remaining amount (₹1,00,000) with the court within 30 days. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendants had validly executed a registered sale agreement dated 22.12.2017 and received substantial advance payment of ₹5,00,000, which effectively admitted the contract's existence. Since the defendants received the substantial consideration, no further proof was required from the plaintiffs under Supreme Court precedent. The defendants' failure to file a written statement and cross-examine witnesses left the plaintiffs' evidence unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts