Mallesh vs Kullamma — 7/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,43,rule,1(R). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KARN210003572024
Filing Number
7/2024
Filing Date
28-03-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
28-03-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mallesh
Adv. HARIS KHAN
Respondent(s)
Kullamma
Shivaramu
Hearing History
Judge: 1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 7/2024 The appellate court allowed Mallesh's appeal and granted a temporary injunction restraining Kullamma and Shivaramu from constructing on the disputed property until trial conclusion. The court found that Mallesh established a prima facie case of ownership through grant documents and land records, while the defendants' claim of adverse possession remained unproven and must be established during trial. Since the defendants' alleged unauthorized possession would cause irreparable harm to the rightful owner, the balance of convenience favored Mallesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 7/2024 The appellate court allowed Mallesh's appeal and granted a temporary injunction restraining Kullamma and Shivaramu from constructing on the disputed property until trial conclusion. The court found that Mallesh established a prima facie case of ownership through grant documents and land records, while the defendants' claim of adverse possession remained unproven and must be established during trial. Since the defendants' alleged unauthorized possession would cause irreparable harm to the rightful owner, the balance of convenience favored Mallesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts