Mangalamma vs T.N.S.R.T.C, Managing Director — 20/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21rule11. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KARN210003392025

e-Filing Number

04-02-2025

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

21-Apr-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

961-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21rule11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mangalamma

    Adv. GIRISHA T.V

  2. 2.Ashwini

    Adv. SRIKANTH H C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.N.S.R.T.C, Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The petition filed by Mangalamma and Ashwini against T.N.S.R.T.C Managing Director was heard before the Lokadalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the respondent (DHR) filed a memo requesting closure of the petition as fully satisfied, and the court granted the petition closed as fully satisfied, indicating an amicable settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Settelment

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 14-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 21-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition filed by Mangalamma and Ashwini against T.N.S.R.T.C Managing Director was heard before the Lokadalath on 14.03.2026. The counsel for the respondent (DHR) filed a memo requesting closure of the petition as fully satisfied, and the court granted the petition closed as fully satisfied, indicating an amicable settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case