S.R Vishwa Barathambika vs S.N Somasundar — 3/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KARN210001152021
Filing Number
3/2021
Filing Date
22-Jan-2021
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
23-Jan-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.R Vishwa Barathambika
Adv. S Hanumantha
-
2.S R Umedevi
-
3.S R Hemanthakumari
-
4.S R Pushpavalli
-
5.S R Suresh Kumar Dead by LRs(Legal Heir) 5.
-
6.Thara T N 5.
-
7.Chandana Minor Represented by Guardian Mother Thara T N
-
8.S R Shanthala
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.N Somasundar
-
2.The Secretary Mathikere Gram Panchayath
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The appellate court dismissed the appeal by S.R. Vishwa Barathambika and others, upholding the trial court's rejection of their suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over ancestral property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to produce valid title documents to establish ownership—revenue records alone do not confirm title—and could not prove possession of the disputed property as on the date of filing suit. Accordingly, the court affirmed the trial court's decision and rejected all relief sought by the appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
IAs
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2025
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2024
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jul-2024
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jan-2024
Call for Records
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Dec-2023
Objection
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2023
Objection
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2023
Objection
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2023
Objection
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2023
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Apr-2023
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2023
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2022
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2022
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Aug-2022
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jun-2022
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-May-2022
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2022
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2021
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Sep-2021
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2021
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Apr-2021
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2021
Summary The appellate court dismissed the appeal by S.R. Vishwa Barathambika and others, upholding the trial court's rejection of their suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over ancestral property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to produce valid title documents to establish ownership—revenue records alone do not confirm title—and could not prove possession of the disputed property as on the date of filing suit. Accordingly, the court affirmed the trial court's decision and rejected all relief sought by the appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts