Syed wadi Muslim Commity Jamayath R/by its Muthavali vs Abdul Raheem — 1/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Order4Ru;e1R. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KARN210001012026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Syed wadi Muslim Commity Jamayath R/by its Muthavali
Adv. HARIS KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abdul Raheem
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: Syed Wadi Muslim Community Jamayath v. Abdul Raheem (M.A. No. 01/2026) The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the trial court's rejection of an interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendant No. 9 from constructing on disputed property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because the property appeared to be subject to a waqf deed dated 1979, placing it outside civil court jurisdiction under Section 85 of the Waqf Act, and the defendant had allegedly purchased his portion through a valid sale deed from co-owners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2026
Case Summary: Syed Wadi Muslim Community Jamayath v. Abdul Raheem (M.A. No. 01/2026) The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the trial court's rejection of an interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendant No. 9 from constructing on disputed property. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because the property appeared to be subject to a waqf deed dated 1979, placing it outside civil court jurisdiction under Section 85 of the Waqf Act, and the defendant had allegedly purchased his portion through a valid sale deed from co-owners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts