Veeregowda .S.M vs Raju M.R — 17/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN210000712021
Filing Number
17/2021
Filing Date
12-Jan-2021
Registration No
17/2021
Registration Date
12-Jan-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Veeregowda .S.M
Adv. M.K.NINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raju M.R
-
2.The New India Assurance Co.Ltd
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2026
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jan-2026
A.D.R.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence.
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-May-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Nov-2023
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Sep-2023
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jul-2023
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Apr-2023
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2023
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Nov-2022
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Sep-2022
IssueView PDF
This document is a court order dated September 1, 2022, from the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Channapatna, outlining the issues to be decided in case MVC 17/2021. The petitioner Veeregowda filed a motor vehicle claim against respondents Raju M.R and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd following a motorcycle accident on July 5, 2020 that caused grievous injuries. The court framed four issues: (1) whether the petitioner proves negligence by the Bajaj Pulsor motorcycle rider caused the accident; (2) whether the motorcycle rider lacked a valid driving license; (3) whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation and the amount; and (4) what order should be awarded. This is an interlocutory order framing issues; the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Sep-2022
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2022
Issues
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jun-2022
Issues
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Mar-2022
Evidence.
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Aug-2021
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2021
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-May-2021
Notice
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2021
This document is a court order dated September 1, 2022, from the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Channapatna, outlining the issues to be decided in case MVC 17/2021. The petitioner Veeregowda filed a motor vehicle claim against respondents Raju M.R and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd following a motorcycle accident on July 5, 2020 that caused grievous injuries. The court framed four issues: (1) whether the petitioner proves negligence by the Bajaj Pulsor motorcycle rider caused the accident; (2) whether the motorcycle rider lacked a valid driving license; (3) whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation and the amount; and (4) what order should be awarded. This is an interlocutory order framing issues; the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts