M. Shivakumar vs Mamatha — 5/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 96 of CPC. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th April 2026.

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KARN210000552023

Case disposed

Filing Number

5/2023

Filing Date

13-01-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

13-01-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA

Judge

1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/s 96 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

M. Shivakumar

Adv. M K NINGAPPA

Respondent(s)

Mamatha

Likth Gowda

Priyadarshini

Girijamma

Hearing History

Judge: 1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

17-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

15-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

07-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

16-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Judgment

SUMMARY The appellate court modified the trial court's partial dismissal in a partition suit involving family property. The trial court had dismissed the suit regarding two property items (Items 1 & 2) which were registered as government "Sarkari Beelu" (forfeited land) due to unpaid revenue. The appellate court found the trial court failed to consider that if the family members pay outstanding taxes and rectify the government error in the revenue records, they can reclaim these properties and partition them equally. The court ordered that upon rectification of the records, the plaintiff and three defendants are each entitled to 1/3 share of Items 1 & 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The appellate court modified the trial court's partial dismissal in a partition suit involving family property. The trial court had dismissed the suit regarding two property items (Items 1 & 2) which were registered as government "Sarkari Beelu" (forfeited land) due to unpaid revenue. The appellate court found the trial court failed to consider that if the family members pay outstanding taxes and rectify the government error in the revenue records, they can reclaim these properties and partition them equally. The court ordered that upon rectification of the records, the plaintiff and three defendants are each entitled to 1/3 share of Items 1 & 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case