M. Shivakumar vs Mamatha — 5/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 96 of CPC. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KARN210000552023
Filing Number
5/2023
Filing Date
13-01-2023
Registration No
5/2023
Registration Date
13-01-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA
Judge
1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Shivakumar
Adv. M K NINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
Mamatha
Likth Gowda
Priyadarshini
Girijamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1564-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The appellate court modified the trial court's partial dismissal in a partition suit involving family property. The trial court had dismissed the suit regarding two property items (Items 1 & 2) which were registered as government "Sarkari Beelu" (forfeited land) due to unpaid revenue. The appellate court found the trial court failed to consider that if the family members pay outstanding taxes and rectify the government error in the revenue records, they can reclaim these properties and partition them equally. The court ordered that upon rectification of the records, the plaintiff and three defendants are each entitled to 1/3 share of Items 1 & 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The appellate court modified the trial court's partial dismissal in a partition suit involving family property. The trial court had dismissed the suit regarding two property items (Items 1 & 2) which were registered as government "Sarkari Beelu" (forfeited land) due to unpaid revenue. The appellate court found the trial court failed to consider that if the family members pay outstanding taxes and rectify the government error in the revenue records, they can reclaim these properties and partition them equally. The court ordered that upon rectification of the records, the plaintiff and three defendants are each entitled to 1/3 share of Items 1 & 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts