Vastu Housing Finance Corporation Ltd Rptd by Naveen Raj D P vs Hanumantha Char — 287/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec.14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020020432025
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
287/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
287/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vastu Housing Finance Corporation Ltd Rptd by Naveen Raj D P
Adv. S R Murthy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hanumantha Char
-
2.Bhagya H
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court granted Vastu Housing Finance Corporation's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, entitling it to take physical possession of the respondents' property in Kanakapura, valued as security for a ₹12 lakh loan. The respondents defaulted on repayment, leaving an outstanding balance of ₹11,83,653, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to execute possession with police assistance after verifying the finance company's compliance with mandatory notice and registration requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
27-Jan-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
30-Dec-2025
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 287/2025
The court granted Vastu Housing Finance Corporation's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, entitling it to take physical possession of the respondents' property in Kanakapura, valued as security for a ₹12 lakh loan. The respondents defaulted on repayment, leaving an outstanding balance of ₹11,83,653, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to execute possession with police assistance after verifying the finance company's compliance with mandatory notice and registration requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts