Narasimhaiah vs Kalamma — 613/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7,Rule1,R/W,Section26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN020017882023

Filing Number

611/2023

Filing Date

20-Dec-2023

Registration No

613/2023

Registration Date

20-Dec-2023

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA

Judge

105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7,Rule1,R/W,Section26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narasimhaiah

    Adv. A D DODDAIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalamma

  2. 2.Lakshmamma @ Lakshmidevamma

  3. 3.Mangalamma

  4. 4.Kumara

  5. 5.Shanthamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Narasimhaiah v. Kalamma and Others (O.S. No. 613/2023) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition and separate possession of joint family properties. Finding that all six suit properties were purchased from joint family income in the father's name (Eerappa, who died in 2017), the court held the plaintiff and five defendants as equal class-I heirs entitled to 1/6th share each. Gift deeds executed by the father favoring two defendants were not binding on co-heirs regarding joint family property. A preliminary decree was ordered for equal partition among all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  11. 24-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  15. 22-Jul-2025

    A.D.R

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  18. 24-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  20. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  21. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  22. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  23. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  24. 14-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  25. 24-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  26. 22-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  28. 28-Mar-2024

    Second List

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  29. 15-Feb-2024

    Second List

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  30. 21-Dec-2023

    Second List

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  31. 20-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 20-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 613/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Narasimhaiah v. Kalamma and Others (O.S. No. 613/2023) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition and separate possession of joint family properties. Finding that all six suit properties were purchased from joint family income in the father's name (Eerappa, who died in 2017), the court held the plaintiff and five defendants as equal class-I heirs entitled to 1/6th share each. Gift deeds executed by the father favoring two defendants were not binding on co-heirs regarding joint family property. A preliminary decree was ordered for equal partition among all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case