KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD., Represented by its Authorized Signatory Sri. Vinod Barimani vs Krishnappa H — 188/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020016532025
e-Filing Number
09-10-2025
Filing Number
188/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
188/2025
Registration Date
18-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
RAMANAGAR TOWN PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD., Represented by its Authorized Signatory Sri. Vinod Barimani
Adv. S R Murthy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krishnappa H
-
2.Sujatha G N
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Krishnappa H and Sujatha G N (2025) The court granted Kotak Mahindra Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, entitling it to take physical possession of a mortgaged property in Ramanagara District. The respondents defaulted on a Rs. 5 lakh loan, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 5,02,328.63, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Execution
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
18-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 188/2025
Case Summary: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Krishnappa H and Sujatha G N (2025) The court granted Kotak Mahindra Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, entitling it to take physical possession of a mortgaged property in Ramanagara District. The respondents defaulted on a Rs. 5 lakh loan, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 5,02,328.63, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts