Manjunatha vs Harshavardhan H N — 274/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/sec.166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN020012902025

Filing Number

198/2025

Filing Date

01-Aug-2025

Registration No

274/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA

Judge

105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/sec.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manjunatha

    Adv. T.K SHANTHAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harshavardhan H N

  2. 2.The Manager, TATA AIG General Insurance. Co. Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In MVC Case 274/2025, petitioner Manjunatha (PW-1) was examined under oath on 17-04-2026. Evidence was recorded including FIR copy, medical reports, injury certificates, IMV report, discharge summary, and X-ray reports. The case was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request for cross-examination; the court noted the witness's testimony was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  10. 22-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 274/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MVC Case 274/2025, petitioner Manjunatha (PW-1) was examined under oath on 17-04-2026. Evidence was recorded including FIR copy, medical reports, injury certificates, IMV report, discharge summary, and X-ray reports. The case was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request for cross-examination; the court noted the witness's testimony was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case