Devarajaiah.V vs Suresh.H.V — 431/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Sec.26,R/w,Order,7,Rule,1. Status: To Hear. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN020011752024
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
431/2024
Filing Date
28-08-2024
Registration No
431/2024
Registration Date
28-08-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devarajaiah.V
Adv. K.M.AMARNATH
Respondent(s)
Suresh.H.V
Jagadeesh.H.V
Shivaramaiah.M
PD 4 Assistant Director of Land Records, Department of Land Records,
Hearing History
Judge: 105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
To Hear
To Hear
IAs
IAs
IAs
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | To Hear |
| 28-03-2026 | To Hear |
| 13-03-2026 | IAs |
| 25-02-2026 | IAs |
| 31-01-2026 | IAs |
Interim Orders
Case 431/2024 Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application No. 4 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC to implead the Assistant Director of Land Records (ADLR), Ramanagara as Defendant No. 4. The plaintiff sought this in a title declaration suit, contending the ADLR wrongfully directed a property survey despite being informed the case was pending. The court found the ADLR a "proper party" (though not strictly necessary) whose presence would assist effective adjudication and prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The plaintiff was directed to amend the plaint to incorporate the ADLR as Defendant No. 4 by April 17, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 431/2024 Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application No. 4 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC to implead the Assistant Director of Land Records (ADLR), Ramanagara as Defendant No. 4. The plaintiff sought this in a title declaration suit, contending the ADLR wrongfully directed a property survey despite being informed the case was pending. The court found the ADLR a "proper party" (though not strictly necessary) whose presence would assist effective adjudication and prevent multiplicity of proceedings. The plaintiff was directed to amend the plaint to incorporate the ADLR as Defendant No. 4 by April 17, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts