Raju vs Rakshith Vitus Vijay — 209/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/sec.166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN020008912025
Filing Number
161/2025
Filing Date
05-Jun-2025
Registration No
209/2025
Registration Date
09-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju
Adv. Sathisha.Y.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rakshith Vitus Vijay
-
2.The Branch Manager, S.B.I. General Insurance.
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
In Motor Vehicle Case 209/2025 (Raju v. Rakshith Vitus Vijay and SBI General Insurance), heard on 29-05-2026 before the Additional District Court for Motor Vehicle Accident Claims in Ramanagara, the petitioner's witness was examined and examination-in-chief was conducted. The petitioner's counsel requested the affidavit be considered as examination-in-chief and submitted documents marked as NIP-16 through NIP-20. The respondent's counsel objected to certain document authenticity. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination; no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
17-Apr-2026
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
18-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 209/2025
In Motor Vehicle Case 209/2025 (Raju v. Rakshith Vitus Vijay and SBI General Insurance), heard on 29-05-2026 before the Additional District Court for Motor Vehicle Accident Claims in Ramanagara, the petitioner's witness was examined and examination-in-chief was conducted. The petitioner's counsel requested the affidavit be considered as examination-in-chief and submitted documents marked as NIP-16 through NIP-20. The respondent's counsel objected to certain document authenticity. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination; no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts