Raju vs Rakshith Vitus Vijay — 209/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/sec.166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KARN020008912025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

161/2025

Filing Date

05-06-2025

Registration No

209/2025

Registration Date

09-06-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA

Judge

105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/sec.166

Petitioner(s)

Raju

Adv. Sathisha.Y.S

Respondent(s)

Rakshith Vitus Vijay

The Branch Manager, S.B.I. General Insurance.

Hearing History

Judge: 105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM

29-05-2026

EVIDENCE

17-04-2026

SUMMONS

13-03-2026

SUMMONS

27-02-2026

IAs

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

27-02-2026
Deposition
29-05-2026
Deposition

In Motor Vehicle Case 209/2025 (Raju v. Rakshith Vitus Vijay and SBI General Insurance), heard on 29-05-2026 before the Additional District Court for Motor Vehicle Accident Claims in Ramanagara, the petitioner's witness was examined and examination-in-chief was conducted. The petitioner's counsel requested the affidavit be considered as examination-in-chief and submitted documents marked as NIP-16 through NIP-20. The respondent's counsel objected to certain document authenticity. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination; no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Motor Vehicle Case 209/2025 (Raju v. Rakshith Vitus Vijay and SBI General Insurance), heard on 29-05-2026 before the Additional District Court for Motor Vehicle Accident Claims in Ramanagara, the petitioner's witness was examined and examination-in-chief was conducted. The petitioner's counsel requested the affidavit be considered as examination-in-chief and submitted documents marked as NIP-16 through NIP-20. The respondent's counsel objected to certain document authenticity. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination; no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case