RAMAKRISHNA vs HONNAPPA — 231/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1989. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KARN020008432022
Filing Number
231/2022
Filing Date
28-Jun-2022
Registration No
231/2022
Registration Date
28-Jun-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
768-Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAKRISHNA
Adv. NAGARAJU N.M
Respondent(s)
-
1.HONNAPPA
-
2.The Manager, New India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
In MVC Case 231/2022 (dated 17.10.2025), the court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence in a motor vehicle accident compensation matter. The petitioner's counsel presented two medical certificates (marked as NIP-20) and 18 medical bills (marked as NIP-21). The court found issues with the respondent's challenge to NIP-21 documents, noting that the respondent failed to produce supporting medical certificates and the witness could not identify which doctors issued the presented documents. The court rejected the respondent's contention that NIP-20 and NIP-21 were fabricated, proceeding with the case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Dec-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-May-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Nov-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Nov-2023
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2023
A.D.R
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Sep-2023
A.D.R
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jun-2023
IssueView PDF
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Mar-2023
Issues
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Feb-2023
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2023
Summons
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2022
Evidence
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Oct-2022
Second List
Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2022
In MVC Case 231/2022 (dated 17.10.2025), the court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence in a motor vehicle accident compensation matter. The petitioner's counsel presented two medical certificates (marked as NIP-20) and 18 medical bills (marked as NIP-21). The court found issues with the respondent's challenge to NIP-21 documents, noting that the respondent failed to produce supporting medical certificates and the witness could not identify which doctors issued the presented documents. The court rejected the respondent's contention that NIP-20 and NIP-21 were fabricated, proceeding with the case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts